Question of the Day – Do you want your music collection in the cloud?


 

jamm_questionofday14

A couple of years ago, after an iTunes update and a glitchy library conversion, I had a vision of the download and the library conversion going away in favor of Apple’s iTunes-iCloud (or whatever you wanted to call it) music service.  I liked the idea.  It had merit.  It was fresh, bold, and innovative.

It had Apple written all over it.

 

iTunes in the Cloud could offer:

  • Reduced storage requirements for end users, as their music would reside in a Cloud/SaaS based library.
  • Apple would only have to have a single copy of any and every song they sold; but would have to maintain an ACL (Access Control List) for each authorized purchaser or user/listener.
  • You’d only download the paid content you wanted to your local HDD or iDevice. You could swap this in and out of your iDevice at will.
  • You could stream YOUR purchased music to your iDevice over 3G/4G (if carrier supported…) or Wi-Fi.
  • Plus any other cloud based benefits you can cram in the model

 

Apple recently introduced VERY basic cloud based services and got some serious push back from the RIAA and other industry influencers (freakin’ communists, all; the greedy bastages…)

However, the question of the day is, Do YOU want your music in the cloud?  Do you want that kind of service and all that it entails, both good and bad?  Will the lack of 3G/4G coverage in the geographical areas you frequen (if applicable) be a huge deterrent to you? Is there ANY difference between storing your music on YOUR hard drive vs. Apple’s hard drive? Should there be?  Should it cost you more or less to do that?  Should there be ANY end user associated costs?  Would you be supportive of a raise in single song costs to (for example…) say, $1.99 per song, to help off set increased royalty (cuz you KNOW the RIAA is going to get a hold of this and eff this one up…), storage and/or licensing costs?

This has been on my mind for a while and I know everyone here at JAMM would love to hear what you have to say.  Why not sound off and give us YOUR thoughts in the comments below?

Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. Is Your Music Bound for the iCloud?
  2. Question of the Day: What Music Service Do You Use?
  3. Question of the Day: What do you hook your music player up to?
  4. Contest Alert: Proporta Wants To Help You Stock Your Music Collection
  5. Apple – EMI Records DRM-Free Music on the iTunes Store

More in JAMM | 1 Comment

1 Comment

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


tjchan
Aug 11, 2010

Anyone remember MP3.com? They had it so you could just insert the original CD to prove ownership and then you can play all the music online. That was the first (that I know of) cloud music. I like the idea…ACL such as NetFlix which limits the number of devices. Question is this though…who’s going to be paying for the bandwidth? Also if everyone were to goto streaming music, how badly would that affect the current network infrastructure? Many services do not provide a guarantee on speed so if your whole block is just constantly streaming, then speeds are going to drop off considerably. Just a couple of thoughts….I like the idea as long as it can be done well without alienating the consumer as well as not overloading the current network infrastructure.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.