Rant – Apple is NOT Going to make a CDMA-based iPhone
I have a lot of respect for ALL of my colleagues on the multiple sites that everyone frequents on the Internet. I’ve been a technology journalist for 15 years. During all of the hub-bub of the Dot-COM bubble burst and subsequent ripples over the past 10 or so years, its not been easy to stay at this. Those sites that have been consistent, with long-term writers have more than likely discovered the "secret sauce" or formula for keeping the content going, for finding out who can do what for <pick a site>, and how to make trusted, consistent contacts.
To everyone in that category, congratulations. You’ve done a great job.
However… and before I get started, I’d like to point out that any article I site is NOT a shot at any one site or any individual writer. This is a dissenting opinion on a specific point in those articles…that’s all.
<RANT>
I saw an interesting opinion based article that was actually quite compelling. The premise of the article, if Apple sold the iPhone 4 on more than one US carrier, the sales would have likely doubled, is very interesting and very compelling. However, the basis of the doubled sales numbers – Verizon – is a pipe dream at best.
Its NEVER (read: reaLLY, REALLY unlikely) going to happen.
I outlined this back in March of this year on JAMM. You can read the article here – Verizon’s iPhone..? Not so Fast… I’ll sum up the major reasons why a Verizon iPhone is likely not going to happen on their CDMA network, but for the full explanation, you really need to read the full article:
- The US is a small (CDMA) market (compared to the global GSM market)
- Not every Verizon Wireless customer is going to buy an iPhone
- A CDMA iPhone would require a COMPLETE device redesign (the cellular radio is much bigger)
- Apple Support Costs would SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE (and finally)
- If Apple were going to add another carrier, they would have done it already (with the introduction of the iPad and the iPhone 4)
The final nail in the VzW iPhone is this – Apple only wants a single version of the device – a GSM version – to circulate. Technology implementation changes (read: functionality changes) would have to be made to accommodate the CDMA radio (it just works differently than a GSM radio) and that is going to do nothing but rub Steve the wrong way. The experience won’t quite the same, and will be different. Again, Stevie J. doesn’t do that; and I don’t blame him.
Simplicity and consistency are what make the iPhone the success that it is. That doesn’t involve a technology change/shift from one cellular technology to another unless he’s going to take the entire world there; and with CDMA, that ain’t gonna happen.
EVER.
No, really… neVER…EVER.
The most likely heir apparent to AT&T’s iPhone in the US is T-Mobile. They are a GSM carrier, and could very easily run the phone on their HSPA+ network (provided the chipset Apple currently uses supports their flavor of HSPA+). If not, changing out that chipset for one that supports BOTH AT&T and T-Mobile is nothing more than an internal part/BOM (Bill of Materials) change; and rather easy to accomplish. That’s NOTHING compared to what will have to happen to create a CDMA based iPhone.
However, I’m not very certain how likely THAT is either. T-Mo (and I do much prefer them to either AT&T or Verizon Wireless here in Chicago) is a MUCH smaller national carrier than AT&T. Its likely that an iPhone release on their network will result in similar kinds of problems with their ordering systems as well as their network, so yah… they’ve got THAT going for them. If Apple were to authorize the iPhone on T-Mobile, you would think that T-Mo would have enough lead time and notice to ramp up their HSPA+ network to be able to handle the traffic. Maybe that’s part of what they’re doing now, with the 25 new cities that have seen HSPA+ rollouts in the last couple of weeks… Who knows..? But honestly, that’s just pure conjecture…
So please, people…everyone… please STOP with the Verizon Wireless iPhone rumors and thoughts. Unless and until a GLOBAL communications standard is established and adopted, we’re SO unlikely to see one, that its really safe to say
It ain’t never gonna happen, so fe-ged-aboud-it.
</RANT>
Just sayin’…


Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Search JAMM »
Our Sponsors
Most Popular »
Thursday, April 19, 2012 22:52 - 0 Comments
Tuesday, April 17, 2012 21:31 - 0 Comments
Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:23 - 0 Comments
Wednesday, April 11, 2012 23:46 - 0 Comments
Tuesday, April 10, 2012 21:25 - 0 Comments
Monday, April 9, 2012 21:24 - 0 Comments
Sunday, April 8, 2012 21:15 - 0 Comments
Sunday, April 8, 2012 0:11 - 0 Comments
Friday, April 6, 2012 9:15 - 0 Comments
Thursday, April 5, 2012 18:36 - 0 Comments
Monday, March 26, 2012 10:21 - 0 Comments
Said tjchan on 2011-12-21 16:38:43
Said Trisha on 2011-12-21 14:43:31
Said michell angulo on 2011-12-16 13:30:37
Said dgoldring on 2011-12-13 19:18:24
Said Craig Lambert on 2011-12-13 11:15:27
Said hotgirllei on 2011-12-02 00:02:48
Said Jeremy on 2011-10-30 08:22:18
Said tjchan on 2011-10-18 08:44:50
From Our Friends »
The Mobile Spoon
Clinton Fitch
Just Another iPad Blog
© 2009 Just Another Mobile Monday . All Rights Reserved. Sign up for entries RSS and for the comments RSS.
JAMM logo by Talon Communications Group |
it's 18.