<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: FlexMail 4.0: Pump Up Your Productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/</link>
	<description>A Practical Look At Mobile Life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37142</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37142</guid>
		<description>One of the things that I have always appreciated from WinMo apps is the ability to do one thing, and do it well. Not to take away from great developers and great applications, sometimes people don't have the time to configure an application, or learn the configuration options. Many apps are over engineered and therefore too complicated. I mean I took about 15 minutes to find and get the date layout in PI that I wanted today. Default configurations for most programs should be better researched and not focused on the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that I have always appreciated from WinMo apps is the ability to do one thing, and do it well. Not to take away from great developers and great applications, sometimes people don&#8217;t have the time to configure an application, or learn the configuration options. Many apps are over engineered and therefore too complicated. I mean I took about 15 minutes to find and get the date layout in PI that I wanted today. Default configurations for most programs should be better researched and not focused on the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgduris</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37140</link>
		<dc:creator>dgduris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37140</guid>
		<description>Alex, I stand corrected.

There is a checkbox in the "Read" section under the Settings option called "Open message only by double-click."  I had that checked.

Never-the-less, while FlexMail 4 really is comprehensive, "Menu&#62; Actions&#62; Mark&#62; For Download" is just crazy! I need "Menu&#62; Download Now"! Better yet, 1-touch download.  That's all - IMHO - FlexMail 4 needs.

Re. PI8: none better!  For me, none in the same league.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I stand corrected.</p>
<p>There is a checkbox in the &#8220;Read&#8221; section under the Settings option called &#8220;Open message only by double-click.&#8221;  I had that checked.</p>
<p>Never-the-less, while FlexMail 4 really is comprehensive, &#8220;Menu&gt; Actions&gt; Mark&gt; For Download&#8221; is just crazy! I need &#8220;Menu&gt; Download Now&#8221;! Better yet, 1-touch download.  That&#8217;s all - IMHO - FlexMail 4 needs.</p>
<p>Re. PI8: none better!  For me, none in the same league.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex_kac</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37139</link>
		<dc:creator>alex_kac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37139</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with some of the comments here. First off, it does not take two taps to open an email in FlexMail unless you have the preview window open. But that makes sense UI wise. So turn OFF the preview window and its one tap to open the email. With a few seconds of configuration you can configure FM to look and act just like the built in email app. 

That's #1. 

#2 - you cannot compare feature-less eye-candy apps like TouchFlo 3D or PointUI to an app like PI. One looks super pretty and makes for a great demo. The other actually does something and looks nice.

#3 - you especially cannot compare iPhone UIs to Windows Mobile. We are developing beautiful iPhone apps today and we can because the iPhone is designed to do that. Windows Mobile isn't. I can make PI spin in 3D if you wish with large buttons for everything. But then what about the person who wants everything stylusy? So I have to design 3 separate UIs? PI already has something like that with the T12 large format keyboard for fast contact searches in 8.1 and the time picker and the touch mode in PI 8. We made many things "finger" friendly in 8.0 and more in 8.1. But we still can't go *too* far because too many people want keyboard only usage. 

#4 I do not understand how anyone could say that you have to struggle through PI and *especially* that the built in Calendar is readable. Month, Year, and Week views are completely unusable in the built in Calendar. Even with PI we have a "Pocket Outlook with Benefits" Role that makes PI work and act like Pocket Outlook with most of the extra menus, features, and so on turned off. 

The problem we have is that we have some users that try the app and look at it for a few minutes which makes it hard for us to show off the fact that its customizable in an easy way. So you have user A who wants the simplest thing with just a bit more power. If you don't show that to him immediately he complaints it too complex. Then you have user B who wants more power and if you show him a super simple UI he assumes it doesn't do anything more than the built in apps so why bother? Neither looks deeper to see that an app like PI especially and to a lesser extent FlexMail can change pretty dramatically from super simple to complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with some of the comments here. First off, it does not take two taps to open an email in FlexMail unless you have the preview window open. But that makes sense UI wise. So turn OFF the preview window and its one tap to open the email. With a few seconds of configuration you can configure FM to look and act just like the built in email app. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s #1. </p>
<p>#2 - you cannot compare feature-less eye-candy apps like TouchFlo 3D or PointUI to an app like PI. One looks super pretty and makes for a great demo. The other actually does something and looks nice.</p>
<p>#3 - you especially cannot compare iPhone UIs to Windows Mobile. We are developing beautiful iPhone apps today and we can because the iPhone is designed to do that. Windows Mobile isn&#8217;t. I can make PI spin in 3D if you wish with large buttons for everything. But then what about the person who wants everything stylusy? So I have to design 3 separate UIs? PI already has something like that with the T12 large format keyboard for fast contact searches in 8.1 and the time picker and the touch mode in PI 8. We made many things &#8220;finger&#8221; friendly in 8.0 and more in 8.1. But we still can&#8217;t go *too* far because too many people want keyboard only usage. </p>
<p>#4 I do not understand how anyone could say that you have to struggle through PI and *especially* that the built in Calendar is readable. Month, Year, and Week views are completely unusable in the built in Calendar. Even with PI we have a &#8220;Pocket Outlook with Benefits&#8221; Role that makes PI work and act like Pocket Outlook with most of the extra menus, features, and so on turned off. </p>
<p>The problem we have is that we have some users that try the app and look at it for a few minutes which makes it hard for us to show off the fact that its customizable in an easy way. So you have user A who wants the simplest thing with just a bit more power. If you don&#8217;t show that to him immediately he complaints it too complex. Then you have user B who wants more power and if you show him a super simple UI he assumes it doesn&#8217;t do anything more than the built in apps so why bother? Neither looks deeper to see that an app like PI especially and to a lesser extent FlexMail can change pretty dramatically from super simple to complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgoldring</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>dgoldring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>Personally, I have been filtering everything to my GMAIL and using the mobile version of Gmail.  It ain't perfect, but it works pretty well.  

And really, Outlook in WinMo 6.0 is a huge improvement over previous versions.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I have been filtering everything to my GMAIL and using the mobile version of Gmail.  It ain&#8217;t perfect, but it works pretty well.  </p>
<p>And really, Outlook in WinMo 6.0 is a huge improvement over previous versions.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgduris</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37136</link>
		<dc:creator>dgduris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37136</guid>
		<description>@ Weiganla,

I strongly recommend ProfiMail from www.lonelycatgames.com.

It doesn't integrate with the PIM, but the interface is great and its rendering of HTML and embedded links is better than anything I have used.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Weiganla,</p>
<p>I strongly recommend ProfiMail from <a href="http://www.lonelycatgames.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lonelycatgames.com</a>.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t integrate with the PIM, but the interface is great and its rendering of HTML and embedded links is better than anything I have used.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weiganla</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37135</link>
		<dc:creator>weiganla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37135</guid>
		<description>Anyone know of a good alternative? Pocket Outlook doesn't quiiiite do it for me, and FlexMail is just more power than I need (besides making my head hurt). My Axim doesn't have Java so I can't get mobile Gmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know of a good alternative? Pocket Outlook doesn&#8217;t quiiiite do it for me, and FlexMail is just more power than I need (besides making my head hurt). My Axim doesn&#8217;t have Java so I can&#8217;t get mobile Gmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgduris</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37134</link>
		<dc:creator>dgduris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37134</guid>
		<description>Let me third that notion about Flexmail.

The user interface - ergo - the user experience is just not appropriate for the mobile environment.  Mobile environemnts are visually compressed and one desires increased efficiency over a computer environment in the ease of making things happen - e.g.: the number of screen clicks it takes to download a message.  Here Flexmail is weak.  It takes multiple clicks/ taps to get a message downloaded.  Opening a message is a two-tap thing, which is counter to the usual 1-tap idiom that is WinMob.

I really like the application's power and integration with the PIM, but, as the iPhone proves, it's all about the UI...and the UE.  Flexmail just isn't user friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me third that notion about Flexmail.</p>
<p>The user interface - ergo - the user experience is just not appropriate for the mobile environment.  Mobile environemnts are visually compressed and one desires increased efficiency over a computer environment in the ease of making things happen - e.g.: the number of screen clicks it takes to download a message.  Here Flexmail is weak.  It takes multiple clicks/ taps to get a message downloaded.  Opening a message is a two-tap thing, which is counter to the usual 1-tap idiom that is WinMob.</p>
<p>I really like the application&#8217;s power and integration with the PIM, but, as the iPhone proves, it&#8217;s all about the UI&#8230;and the UE.  Flexmail just isn&#8217;t user friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spmwinkel</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37131</link>
		<dc:creator>spmwinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37131</guid>
		<description>I agree, I'd love more control over my PIM and messages, but WebIS just doesn't "click" with my user experience. They're great products for power users, but I'm simply not getting the benefit from them. (Or, more precise: the benefits don't beat the struggle with the clearness of Pocket Outlook and the built-in calendar)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I&#8217;d love more control over my PIM and messages, but WebIS just doesn&#8217;t &#8220;click&#8221; with my user experience. They&#8217;re great products for power users, but I&#8217;m simply not getting the benefit from them. (Or, more precise: the benefits don&#8217;t beat the struggle with the clearness of Pocket Outlook and the built-in calendar)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragart</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37130</guid>
		<description>Great look, Steve!

I tried the beta out for a month or so and really appreciated all the options, but there was just something missing in it for me. The same thing happened with the newest version of Pocket Informant. WebIS makes a seemingly solid product, but I think the UI isn't quite there yet, especially in Flexmail. I think it's still a pretty big transition from the older stylus world of WM and the sleeker and larger UIs of modern WM programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great look, Steve!</p>
<p>I tried the beta out for a month or so and really appreciated all the options, but there was just something missing in it for me. The same thing happened with the newest version of Pocket Informant. WebIS makes a seemingly solid product, but I think the UI isn&#8217;t quite there yet, especially in Flexmail. I think it&#8217;s still a pretty big transition from the older stylus world of WM and the sleeker and larger UIs of modern WM programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgoldring</title>
		<link>http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2008/07/05/review-flexmail-40-pump-up-your-productivity/#comment-37129</link>
		<dc:creator>dgoldring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/?p=10322#comment-37129</guid>
		<description>Nice review, Steve.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review, Steve.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
